Upper Left Edge

a small paper for a small planet

  • Sign In
  • About Us
    • Welcome
    • History
  • The Edge in Print
  • Writers
  • Links
  • Contact
  • Support
    • Underwrite
  • Tides
  • Categories
    • Art
    • Photography
    • Books
    • Culture
    • Healing
    • Spirit
    • Entertainment
    • Food
    • Happenings
    • Movies
    • Song and Dance
    • Television
    • Fiction
    • Nature
    • Plant Medicine
    • Poetry
    • Politics

Why I Moved to Astoria

October 26, 2013 by Rabbi Bob 5 Comments

forest

Looking out my living room window…

About eight years ago, the same day that Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans, my family and I moved from the Wallingford neighborhood of Seattle to Astoria — specifically to the Emerald Heights Apartments, past the Alderbrook neighborhood at the very eastern edge of the city. So many times was I asked why I moved to Astoria that I actually started a website with that domain (I’ve since taken the site down). I guess people are always curious why someone would move to a small town – their small town. Well, in the beginning, without much experience living here, I told folks things like “the cool Victorian houses” or “the beautiful view of the Columbia River Estuary” or “you can’t beat the view from the Astor Column” (they’ve since officially changed the name to the Astoria Column). There were also the reasons why we moved away from Seattle, like a crumbling school system, a property dispute with a neighbor, traffic and more.

The story goes that on the way to Cannon Beach for a summer vacation, we stopped in Astoria for gas, and I got out and took a quick look around. Wow! I was floored by the old Victorians (I love old architecture), the view, and the small town character. I made an off-hand remark to my wife that “we should move here,” and she dismissed it as a lark. The second time this same thing happened, the next summer, she started to think that maybe it was a decent idea. A couple years later, we were here.

As with all trips, one of the best things about the move to Astoria was the scenery on the way. I grew up in big cities — New York and Philadelphia — and after moving to Berkeley and living in the Bay Area for years, I moved to Seattle, where it seemed to me at the time like Astoria, a small city with lots of trees, not much traffic, and friendly people. But the trip there was amazing! I took myself and most of my belongings in my Subaru and drove up the California and Oregon coasts, and eventually up I-5 to the Emerald City. The redwoods, the beaches, the evergreens, the relatively empty roads (getting out of the Bay Area on weekends was an all-day affair). Well, the roads aren’t empty anymore, and the trees are losing ground to development adjacent to, and of, the highways.

The trip to Astoria from Seattle that late August day in 2005 ended with rare thunderstorms on Highway 30. I remember commenting about two things: one was the eclectic programming of KMUN (I’m now part of that community), and the other was the wonderful tree-lined, boulevard-like nature of the highway from Longview to Astoria. Little did I know that circumstances would conspire to strip the trees from the side of that road several years later.

We quickly found a house in the Uppertown neighborhood of Astoria, where we still live. After only two months at Emerald Heights, we moved a couple miles west, and in both places, tall conifers and big-leaf maples and other natives surrounded us. But severe storms are part of living near the coast, and the whopper was The Great Gale of 2007, when Astoria and the surrounding area lost thousands of trees in 3 days of 100+ mph winds and rain. There was a less severe storm the year before, which had started the carnage. And then there was the man-made additional destruction as dozens of very tall surviving trees were cut to assuage people’s fears that they would be victims of the next big storm.

Emerald Heights was decimated. I helped with a tree planting project there after the storm, but even if some of the trees we planted do mature, it will be decades before anything resembling a tree cover will be reestablished (if we even let it). I also helped to plant trees in several other areas around Astoria, and on hikes since then, I see that some of those trees are starting to grow.

But this is a logging town, and the propensity to log seems to be outweighing any tendency towards wanting to maintain the urban (or more correctly, rural) forest. Several property owners and the city have cleared large sections of what was forest for various reasons since then, and the recession seems to have increased that activity (at least some people are still in business). Though the woods near my home have lost a significant amount of trees, and neighbors have cut down many of their big trees in recent years, there is still a greenbelt that runs from the river up the hill to the east of us, ending in preserved land in the watershed that supplies Astoria with its water. This greenbelt continues east above Irving Avenue clear over to Clatsop Community College, and includes the Astoria Column area, parks and trails.

One of the wonderful parts of living where I do is this surrounding forest. I walk the trails in these areas often, and walk to work at the college along Irving Avenue, which has wonderful woods on either side punctuated by houses every now and then. Many of these wooded areas are the result of a huge landslide in the 1950s, after which the city decided to prohibit construction in them, at least up till now.

Just the other day, I found out that the city plans to sell off the whole thing — all the woods east of the developed area where I live, and most of the woods above Irving Avenue, which are the lone surviving trees from the hillside south of them from the Great Gale. And not to some conservancy for protection, but with the express purpose of building on them. It’s all part of a huge garage sale of city land that is supposed to put this land back on the tax rolls, and increase the availability of buildable land for future population increases. And yes, it’s state-mandated, and the city has been pursuing this for many years.

I’ve watched as whole swaths of wooded lands in Warrenton, the neighboring town, have been cut down and paved over for roads, malls, and housing developments, and my favorite back roads have gone from pleasant ways to get to the beach, the southern part of the county, and even to the animal shelter, to further stressors for me, so that I don’t use them anymore. Highway 30 and Highway 26, the two main routes to Portland and beyond, have become logging roads, as trees are removed from the shoulders so that the sheriff is sure that none will harm travelers. So I take the “back way” to Seattle now, traveling Highway 101 up the Washington coast. Certainly not devoid of logging, but rarely do I see cutting right on the road, or cars for that matter.

But now it’s coming right near my home, and I won’t just watch that happen. I’m hoping Upper Left Edge readers, friends, neighbors, officials, and everyone else will rally to prevent this sale from taking place, and instead insist that the city preserve and protect these lands as a buffer from storms, a place to recreate and relax, and as a backdrop for our city. Because I moved to Astoria in large part because the forest permeated the town, a place where deer and other wildlife can be found in our backyards because they are often adjacent to forests, a place where walking to work or walking the dog could find you in or by that forest (and that wildlife).

As I look out the window above my computer into my neighbor’s yard, I see native conifers that didn’t blow down during the gale or any of the other storms we’ve experienced since moving here. If I get up and look out my living room window, I can see the edge of the forest that would be sold for housing. And I only have to walk up the road to see the conifers above Irving Avenue that survived the Great Gale and realize that if they were to be cut down to supply more housing (with a view!), that we would lose the last trees on the top of the ridge in this area, since the others were mowed down by the winds those three days in December 2007.

And I’d realize that many of the reasons I moved to Astoria would no longer be there.

Filed Under: Featured Writing, Nature, Politics, ULE Tagged With: Astoria

About Rabbi Bob

The name Rabbi Bob comes from my role in the Coaster Theatre production of Fiddler on the Roof in 2006. In addition to writing for the Edge, I master the website and occasionally write for HIPFiSH, tutor mostly math and science at Clatsop Community College, and work as a preK-12 substitute teacher and instructional aide for school districts in the area. I love hosting Bedtime Stories on KMUN, and also love to sing with the North Coast Chorale. And yes, I love to portray other people on stage. I'm a New Yorker that has also lived in Berkeley, Adelaide and Seattle. I've lived in Astoria for the past 17 and some years (got here the day Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans).

Comments

  1. Watt Childress says

    October 29, 2013 at 11:02 pm

    I think this is one of the best pieces you’ve written, Bob. Straight from the heart.

    Select developers, realtors, bankers, and builders may cash in on the sacrifice of community forests. Yet those who package this sell-off as a pitch to “expand the tax base” often underestimate the full costs of new urban utilities and services. It’s also common for them to overlook increased vulnerability to landslides, flooding, and other problems.

    In the end, though, the greatest harm done by such sacrifice involves our souls. Call it our deep well-being, if you wish. Humans need those forests as much as the other creatures that make this place home.

    Reply
    • Rabbi Bob says

      November 1, 2013 at 8:43 pm

      Thanks for your kind words, Brother Watt. It looks like there is some hope to save much of the land being sold off. Several property owners are bidding on adjoining property to create a natural buffer between their land and others, and to protect their home from slides by maintaining the undeveloped nature of these parcels. Land trusts are interested in the forested areas near my house, and may end up bidding on them. Folks have stepped up to my call to unite in defense of the forests in Astoria, and we may be able to shame the city into protecting these forests. In an incredible irony, the project head for these sales is Mike Morgan, mayor of Cannon Beach, who was instrumental in the land swap that brought tons of forestland near Cannon Beach into protection, and city hands.

      Hey, maybe Cannon Beach will buy Astoria’s forests and protect them!

      Reply
  2. Rabbi Bob says

    November 3, 2013 at 9:13 am

    I keep thinking of this. It haunts me all through the day and through the night. There’s a pattern emerging that is ominous. In the past year or so, there have been now three large proposals for the selling off of city land, almost all of it forested.

    First, it emerged that a deal had been struck between the city, the school district, Recology and Columbia Memorial Hospital to build a $5 million stadium for high school sports on top of the old city landfill in exchange for the hospital getting the current high school football field for development. Next, I found out the day of a city council meeting that there was a whole neighborhood for sale in a currently forested section of Astoria. Now, I find out via a newspaper article that several properties throughout the city – including most notably a sizable chunk of undeveloped land that provides a greenbelt to the eastern end of the city – are already for sale.

    Actually, a fourth project – the implementation of the Riverfront Vision Plan – also seems to be beginning after a five or six year delay, while the nation and the area went through a devastating recession.

    The pattern is clear – the city is attempting to convert forest to pavement and buildings, perhaps to make up for the lack of such activity over the last few years.

    The simultaneous pattern that is equally if not more ominous is that all these actions were taken with little or no public discussion beforehand, except for the case of the Riverfront Vision Plan. That one had plenty of discussion a few years ago, and some now, but the plan that was approved doesn’t look anything like what the vast majority of the public said it should look like.

    Is there a way to affect the city plans? Going to meetings, workshops, presentations? Getting on committees? Running for office? Complaining via phone and email? Getting other people to stand with you in meetings, complaining, committees, workshops? Enlisting other groups? Writing about it?

    The anti-LNG crowd has made great strides over many years using all of the above. They continue their protests, action and tenacity and they might just succeed.

    But in the meantime, a huge amount of land of has been paved over in Warrenton, and now the pavement is spreading to Astoria, and perhaps Seaside and Cannon Beach, where proposals are afoot to set up campuses in the forested hills to avoid the inevitable earthquake and tsunami damage that would devastate their institutions near the beach.

    The Nygaards own a good portion of the land between Astoria and Warrenton, and a fair amount of Warrenton also. Other old-time families and developers own much of the rest. Their aim with this land is well-known – they want to develop it and gain profit. What if developers owned the forest east of Astoria? Or much of the forest inside Astoria? Well, it’s starting to happen, and I don’t like the possibilities. It used to be that governments bought land to protect it (like Cannon Beach recently did), but what are we up against when governments sell land to develop it?

    Reply
  3. rachel.petrovich.miller says

    February 12, 2014 at 10:27 am

    Hi. I’m new to this site, and this was the first piece I read. My family and I are in the process of trying to move to Astoria from Portland, which is proving to be far more challenging than we’d thought, and we’d thought it would be! I had no idea such plans were in place for the urban forest. It is really upsetting. We are hoping to move in an effort to escape the pavement. We were seduced by how the forest overruns Astoria, and how the deer and trees seem to be holding a steady claim on the city. You’ve already so eloquently explained why this would be a travesty; I don’t want to embarrass myself by trying to say it differently. It just felt like such a suckerpunch to read about it. I hope that many people are reading about this and that if we can make the move, we will be able to join efforts to help prevent this from happening.

    Reply
  4. Rabbi Bob says

    February 13, 2014 at 11:09 pm

    Thanks for sharing your plans with our community, Rachel. There’s some good news regarding the sales that I can report. We’ve formed a group called Friends of Astoria Natural Areas (FANA), and council meetings have been jammed with people concerned about the program. I and some neighbors managed to get a fair amount of the land east of here off the sales list, and so far, only some small lots have been bought, all by neighbors that claim they will keep it as is, or at least not build. The council will be considering ending the sales program early at a retreat soon. We’re keeping up the pressure, and the latest sale was blocked by the council. We’re putting a web site together, and submitted a petition to the council to have a public meeting on the issue.

    The other projects mentioned are moving forward, but the rally behind the issue of natural areas makes me hopeful that we can maintain the integrated forest in Astoria, that both you and I really like, even if it is not as amazing as it was a few years ago.

    Good luck on the move, and certainly both the Upper Left Edge community, and Astoria, welcomes a kindred spirit from the Rose City. Stay in touch.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Gleanings

Here Try Some of This Ointment

April 17, 2024 By Watt Childress 4 Comments

We are the Luminaries

August 8, 2023 By Watt Childress 2 Comments

Open Letter for Creation’s Caregivers

June 19, 2023 By Watt Childress 5 Comments

My November 2022 Ballot Choices

November 6, 2022 By Rabbi Bob 1 Comment

One Cup of Tea

November 15, 2020 By Lila Danielle 1 Comment

Additional Wisdom...

Readers’ Comments

  • Watt Childress April 28, 2025 at 11:48 am on Uncle Zech’s Amphibious GestaltAlso, you inspired me to insert a sentence crediting Hoyt Axton with the song's genesis. Many thanks!
  • Watt Childress April 27, 2025 at 10:55 pm on Uncle Zech’s Amphibious GestaltThank you kindly Jim for reading this and commenting. I enjoyed your review of "Sun House" by David James Duncan,
  • Jim Stewart April 27, 2025 at 8:26 pm on Uncle Zech’s Amphibious GestaltNice! Hoyt Axton wrote the Jeremiah song and sang it with great gusto. Life wanders on and I'm still glad
  • Watt Childress April 26, 2025 at 3:51 pm on Uncle Zech’s Amphibious GestaltDuring spring I think of you, and all the May Pole celebrations you've organized over the years. So grateful for
  • Watt Childress April 26, 2025 at 3:18 pm on Uncle Zech’s Amphibious GestaltIn my dreams I sing to the multitudes, with a voice as clear and sweet and churchy as Lou Reed.
More Comments...

Confessional (archive)

Come into The Confessional -- view the former Upper Left Edge forum entries.

Pages

Home | Contact | Advertise | Underwrite | The Confessional | Welcome | History | User Agreement | Privacy Policy

Post Categories

Archives on the Edge

Upper Left Edge

P.O. Box 1096
Cannon Beach, OR 97110

Send an e-mail

© 2012–2025  Upper Left Edge